This November, Maine's Question 1 is worded as follows:
"Do you want to reject the new law that lets same-sex couples marry and allows individuals and religious groups to refuse to perform these marriages?"
OK, so the law is written to allow same-sex couple to marry but it allows individuals and religious groups to discriminate? Should I vote yes, or vote no? Yes and No (respectively).
This question is about retracting a recent law that allowed same-sex couples to marry. I don't consider myself very political, and I don't really keep up to date on all that stuff, but this law hits home for me. Because it is so important to me, I thought I would write this piece in hopes that it would help others understand my point of view.
It's important that people understand that this is not about religion, God and spirituality, it is about a legal right, like voting. It wasn't so long ago that women couldn't vote, African Americans couldn't drink from the same water fountain as a white person and interracial marriage was taboo. Looking back, we can see how ridiculous it was to have had prevented these basic human rights. While there was a fierce battle to obtain these rights, we can now see that it was a fight worth fighting.
I hear statements like "Civil unions are OK, but I am not for gay marriage", "Marriage is between one man and one woman", "marriage is a biblical term and allowing same sex marriages is blasphemous" and "if we allow same sex couples to get married, then the next thing we will be doing is letting people marry animals". I hate to say it, but I just cringe when I hear these words. I am not about preventing people from having their beliefs or opinions and I am certainly not anti-religion; I just think that there is a lot of confusion about what this law is all about.
This law is not about the ceremony of marriage (which typically takes place in a church with a minister) rather, it is about the law, the part that takes place at city hall, the licence ... the legal recognition that two people are, by the legal term, married. This is a critical distinction. The term Marriage has a ceremonial, spiritual and personal meaning for people and the term Marriage also has a legal meaning. When you complete your taxes, and the form asks if you are married, it is not asking if you are "ceremonially" married, it is asking if your are legally married. Each terminology of married is independent of one another. You can be married by the church, but that has nothing to do with LAW. Likewise, you can be legally married (get your license at city hall) and you have all the legal benefits of being married ... without the church, without the ceremony in front of God, your family and friends. Do you see the difference?
This law is about proving the same legal protections and benefits to same sex couples who choose to spend their life together. For example, if I should be hospitalized and not able to direct my own healthcare, my partner could not make decisions about my healthcare (without a legal exception). There is also the issue of healthcare, retirement, and many other legal situations which are taken for granted when people get married.
This law is not about challenging the ceremonial process, it is about a legal right which should be available to all human beings.
OK, looks like I might be going on a bit of a rant, so I will wrap it up. I would love to hear your comments.
Thanks,
Tom